होम युद्ध पाकिस्तान: युद्ध में रहते हुए भी शांति का दलाल युद्ध पाकिस्तान: युद्ध में रहते हुए भी शांति का दलाल द्वारा Priya Khandelwal - 22 अप्रैल، 2026 17 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsApp skip to content 
राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा समाचार के लिए आपका विश्वसनीय स्रोत & विश्लेषण
 


22 अप्रैल, 2026 | 09:56 AM
 Trending: Iran Hormuz इजराइल मध्य पूर्व यूक्रेन Sign Upलॉग In खोज और अर्ध; अनुभाग नेविगेशनखोलें खोज Trending ओपन सोर्स रिपोर्ट <a class=equals; विश्लेषण अफ्रीकाएशियायूरोपलैटिन अमेरिकामध्य पूर्वउत्तरी अमेरिकाTech/Cyber राय क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>न्यूज़लेटर पॉडकास्ट state Secrets किताबें पुस्तक समीक्षाएंलेखक साक्षात्कारTheUnder/कवर बुक स्टोरसमीक्षक दिशा-निर्देश क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>घटनाएँ क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>डेड ड्रॉप Shop सब्सक्राइबर+ सब्सक्राइबर+सेवा की शर्तें और मूल्य निर्धारण में अपग्रेड करें नीति खोलें खोज बंद करें Search Search सामग्री लेखक 
 नवीनतम कहानियाँ
 Trending ओपन सोर्स रिपोर्ट <a class=equals; विश्लेषण अफ्रीकाएशियायूरोपलैटिन अमेरिकामध्य पूर्वउत्तरी अमेरिकाTech/Cyber राय क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>न्यूज़लेटर पॉडकास्ट state Secrets किताबें पुस्तक समीक्षालेखक साक्षात्कारअंडर/कवर बुक स्टोरसमीक्षक दिशानिर्देश घटनाएँ क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>डेड ड्रॉप Shop सब्सक्राइबर+ सब्सक्राइबर+सेवा की शर्तें और मूल्य निर्धारण में अपग्रेड करें नीति सामान्य पूछताछ के लिए कृपया ईमेल करें
 info@thecipherbrief.period;com close mebmership form Welcome! जुड़े रहने और अपना अधिकतम लाभ उठाने के लिए लॉग इन करें अनुभव। वर्ग=’साइनइन-संदेश’>साइन इन <इनपुट आईडी='सदस्य-ईमेल-इनपुट' प्रकार='ईमेल' आकार=बराबर;'64' अधिकतम लंबाई=बराबर;'64' आवश्यक='आवश्यक' मान='' प्लेसहोल्डर="अपना ईमेल दर्ज करें" onkeyup="this.setAttribute('value', यह.मान);" पैटर्न=equals;'^( ;=equals;?^_`{|}~]| नवीनीकरण सदस्यता Home>; International>; <a href/ >; &न्यूलाइन; पाकिस्तान: युद्ध में रहते हुए भी शांति का दलाल&न्यूलाइन; अफगानिस्तान के साथ युद्ध, ईरान में अस्थिरता, और भारत के साथ तनाव एक क्षेत्रीय संकट में परिवर्तित हो रहा है जिसे रोकने के लिए इस्लामाबाद को संघर्ष करना पड़ सकता है। 2026 International 27 फरवरी 2026 को नंगरहार प्रांत में अफगानिस्तान और पाकिस्तान के बीच तोरखम सीमा के पास सुरक्षाकर्मी खड़े थे। जब पाकिस्तान ने अफगान राजधानी और तालिबान अधिकारियों के दक्षिणी पावर बेस पर हवाई हमले किए तो काबुल और कंधार में एएफपी के पत्रकारों ने धमाकों और जेट विमानों की आवाज सुनी। 
 (फोटो ऐमल ज़हीर द्वारा / गेटी इमेजेज के माध्यम से एएफपी)
 
 By
 class=”author_title-underlined”>होली मैके योगदान करने वाला सिफर ब्रीफ रिपोर्टर होली मैके एक सिफर ब्रीफ योगदानकर्ता लेखक&comma है; अन्वेषक और अल्पविराम और “ओनली क्राई फॉर द लिविंग” के लेखक; आईएसआईएस बैटलफील्ड के अंदर से मेमो”… उन्होंने पहले युद्ध और अल्पविराम, आतंकवाद, अल्पविराम और मानवता के खिलाफ अपराधों पर ध्यान देने के साथ चौदह वर्षों से अधिक समय तक फॉक्स न्यूज डिजिटल के लिए एक खोजी और अंतरराष्ट्रीय मामलों और युद्ध संवाददाता के रूप में काम किया था। id=equals;”sPost_Default_Layout_0_0_16_0_0_1_0_7_1_0_0_0_0_0_1″> अभी कुछ सप्ताह पहले, पाकिस्तान, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका और ईरान, के साथ युद्ध चल रहा था href=equals;”https://www.thecipherbrief.com/asia/afghanington”>अफगानिस्तान में को वर्षों में दोनों देशों के बीच सबसे खराब संघर्ष के रूप में वर्णित किया गया है A पाकिस्तान और अफगानिस्तान के बीच युद्धविराम जो 19 मार्च की आधी रात से 24 मार्च की आधी रात तक चलने वाला था – और सऊदी के अनुरोध पर मध्यस्थता की गई अरब, कतर, और तुर्की – ने लगभग एक महीने में पहली बार शांति की पेशकश की, जिसे व्यापक रूप से खुले युद्ध के रूप में वर्णित किया गया था। कुछ विश्लेषक इसे एक जोखिम/p> पाकिस्तान के सूचना मंत्री अताउल्लाह तरार थे स्पष्ट: छुट्टियों की अवधि के दौरान पाकिस्तान के अंदर कोई भी सीमा पार से हमला या आतंकवादी घटना होने पर ऑपरेशन ग़ज़ब लिल हक अधिक तीव्रता के साथ फिर से शुरू होगा। “पाकिस्तान आतंकवाद के खतरे को खत्म करने के लिए दृढ़ता से प्रतिबद्ध है,†he ने कहा. पिछले युद्धविराम आयोजित नहीं किए गए थे। अक्टूबर 2025 कुछ ही दिनों में विफल हो गया – इस्तांबुल शांति वार्ता 29 अक्टूबर को टूट गई और पाकिस्तान ने कुछ ही समय बाद तालिबान सरकार को धमकी दी। दिसंबर 2025 में सऊदी के नेतृत्व वाली मध्यस्थता भी विफल रही “अफगानिस्तान के खिलाफ खुला युद्ध. फरवरी के अंत में ऑपरेशन ग़ज़ब लिल हक – काबुल भर में तालिबान के ठिकानों पर हवाई और ज़मीनी हमले, कंधार&अल्पविराम; पक्तिया&अल्पविराम; नांगरहार&अल्पविराम; खोस्त&अल्पविराम; और पक्तिका&अल्पविराम; सबसे महत्वपूर्ण क्रॉस-बॉर्डर सैन्य कार्रवाई 2021 में तालिबान के दोबारा सत्ता में आने के बाद से। पाकिस्तानी अधिकारी अब दावा करते हैं कि 684 से अधिक तालिबान लड़ाके मारे गए, 912 से अधिक घायल&अल्पविराम; 252 पोस्ट नष्ट&अल्पविराम; और 229 टैंक&अल्पविराम; बख्तरबंद वाहन&अल्पविराम; और तोपखाने की बंदूकेंaction. तालिबान उन सभी आंकड़ों पर विवाद करता है। पाकिस्तानी हवाई हमलों ने काबुल पर हमला किया है बार-बार, अफगान बलों ने ड्रोन और मोर्टार सीमा पार वापस भेजे हैं, और संयुक्त राष्ट्र है लड़ाई शुरू होने के बाद से कम से कम 289 अफगान नागरिक हताहत हुए – उनमें से 104 बच्चे और अल्पविराम; 59 महिलाएं। सबसे खराब दिन 16 मार्च को आया। एक पाकिस्तानी हवाई हमले ने Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital in Kabul while patients were inside. Afghan authorities counted more than 400 dead. The UN put the confirmed figure at 143 or more. Pakistan said it had struck only military infrastructure. The following day, mass funerals moved through the capital. Aparna Pande, Senior Fellow for India and South Asia at the Hudson Institute, tells The Cipher Brief that the ceasefire pattern should surprise no one. “Historically speaking, these ceasefires have never been durable,†she says. “Each side has simply used the pause in fighting to rebuild and replenish before the next round.†With the truce now expiring and both sides’ core grievances entirely unresolved, the question pressing analysts is whether Islamabad has a realistic end-state in mind, or whether open war with a nuclear-armed state’s most volatile neighbor has become a policy that Pakistan can start but not finish. A relationship Pakistan can no longer manage The roots of this conflict run directly through Islamabad’s own strategic choices. For decades, Pakistan cultivated the Afghan Taliban as a buffer against Indian influence, the doctrine of “strategic depth,†conceived in the 1980s, envisioned a pliant Kabul as an extension of Pakistani security space. That calculation has collapsed entirely. The immediate trigger for the current war is the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, the militant group that Islamabad accuses Kabul of sheltering and enabling. TTP attacks inside Pakistan have dramatically escalated since 2021, and Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir said during a March 4 visit to troops in South Waziristan that peace can only exist if the Taliban “renounced their support for terrorism and terrorist organisations.†The Taliban, meanwhile, have never recognized the Durand Line, the colonial-era border Pakistan regards as sacrosanct, and that dispute alone makes any durable political settlement nearly impossible to achieve. Aref Dostyar, Director of the Afghanistan Program at the University of Notre Dame and former senior Afghan diplomat, tells The Cipher Brief that Pakistan’s military logic is backfiring on itself. “If the goal is to weaken the Taliban, Pakistan’s aggression is backfiring because it is triggering a ‘rally round the flag’ effect,†he says. “Even Taliban opponents are being cornered to choose between supporting the current regime’s stance against Pakistan or appearing to justify foreign aggression. Most are choosing the former.†The strategic paradox here is stark: Islamabad is now at war with an actor it once created, sustained, and expected to serve its interests indefinitely. Pande is equally direct: any durable agreement would require each side to move off entrenched positions that the other has shown no willingness to abandon. The Afghan Taliban would need to pressure their ideological ally, the TTP, to ease attacks inside Pakistan. For its part, Pakistan would need to accept that “it cannot combat an insurgent movement through conventional means and hence offer some economic and other incentives,†Pande says, underscoring that “there is a reason a compromise has not happened as both sides are sticking to their hardline positions.†Dostyar also questions Islamabad’s underlying objectives. “Pakistan cites the TTP as justification for ‘open war,’ but its true aims are unclear,†he analyzes. “Mapping the specific locations of Afghan targets may reveal an agenda that contradicts their stated counter-terrorism goals.†The Iranian dimension The war in Afghanistan, however, is not happening in isolation. On February 28, coordinated United States and Israeli strikes on Iran killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and triggered a rapidly expanding Middle East conflict. For Pakistan, already engaged in open fighting on its northwestern border, the implications of Iranian instability on its southwestern frontier are severe. Pakistan’s western frontier with Iran runs for 565 miles, cutting through territory where both sides of the border — Pakistan’s Balochistan and Iran’s Sistan-Balochistan — have long hosted ethno-separatist insurgencies. Roughly $1.4 billion in goods moved between the two countries in 2024-2025, most of it through barter deals and informal crossings rather than anything approaching a formal trade architecture. Iranian fuel and food have kept Balochistan’s markets from seizing up entirely since the Afghan border shut in October. That lifeline now runs through a war zone, and the border districts of Balochistan, among Pakistan’s poorest, would feel any disruption most acutely. Afghanistan shares its own 572-mile border with Iran, and the stakes for Kabul are equally acute. Iran hosts an estimated three to five million Afghan refugees and migrant workers. It serves as Afghanistan’s primary remaining trade route to the sea via Chabahar port, a lifeline that became critical after Pakistan closed its border in October. With that route now disrupted by the war, Afghanistan faces a dual economic squeeze that has no near-term resolution. Pande points out that the security calculus around Balochistan is shifting fast. “Groups like the BLA have used Iranian and Afghan Baluchistan to operate inside Pakistani Baluchistan,†she observes. The BLA, the Balochistan Liberation Army, is the most powerful of several insurgent groups operating in the province, a banned separatist organization designated a foreign terrorist group by the United States that seeks to carve an independent Balochistan from Pakistani territory and has escalated sharply in recent months, carrying out coordinated bombings, train hijackings, and mass casualty attacks. “Instability inside Iran can be helpful to these groups as it may make it easier for them to move across the borders and also easier to find access to military equipment,†Pande continues, stressing that the picture cuts both ways. “Instability inside Iran and the Iranian state’s focus on the western frontier means the Pakistani state may find it easier to target these Baluch groups, knowing that Iran’s attention is diverted.†Pakistan is also home to an estimated 15 to 20 percent Shia population, one of the largest outside Iran. Violence erupted in Pakistani cities following news of Khamenei’s death. Jihadist networks, including the Islamic State Khorasan Province, al-Qaeda, and the TTP, have been trying to expand their footprints in Balochistan, and instability in Iran would divert Pakistani security resources toward border management, creating an opening for those networks to grow. In Balochistan’s Makran coast region, home to the Chinese-operated deep-sea port of Gwadar, local officials have advised residents to avoid Iranian territory entirely. A nuclear state on three fronts Then there is India. Last May, the two nuclear-armed neighbors fought their most intense clash since 1971. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, striking nine sites linked to militant groups Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir — the first time India had struck inside Pakistan’s Punjab province since the 1971 war. When reports surfaced that Pakistan had summoned its Nuclear Command Authority, the body that controls decisions over its nuclear arsenal, the crisis took on a different character altogether. Analysts read it as a calculated signal. Pakistani officials later said no such meeting occurred. Fears of escalation to the nuclear threshold drove United States government involvement, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio working the phones before President Trump announced the ceasefire on social media on May 10. The intervention produced a fragile truce yet left the underlying tensions entirely intact. Delhi has held the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance since then, a move Islamabad has called an act of war. The Indus basin supplies roughly 80 percent of Pakistan’s irrigated agricultural land and underpins a sector that accounts for nearly a quarter of GDP. Dostyar does not mince words about where all this leaves Islamabad. “Pakistan is facing a failing economy, political instability, and internal separatist movements,†he asserts. “In the face of all this, it is an enormous gamble to engage in multiple external conflicts. It may be a ‘distraction’ strategy, but it poses a significant regional risk, particularly regarding the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.†Pande agrees the military believes it can manage all three frontiers for now, partly because of what she describes as confidence in Washington’s backing and a mutual defense arrangement Pakistan concluded with Saudi Arabia in September 2025, which stipulates that any aggression against either country is treated as aggression against both. Still, she flags a structural weakness in the information campaign that sustains it. “The message being sent by the top brass is that events that are happening are a conspiracy against Pakistan, in an attempt to rally the people to support the state and its actions,†she says. That Washington has left the mediation work entirely to Ankara, Doha, and Riyadh is itself telling and consequential. As Dostyar puts it, “Washington’s apparent absence from mediation is likely driven by either insufficient awareness about what is truly going on or a strategic choice due to competing priorities.†In plain terms, the United States is either not paying close enough attention or has decided this fire is someone else’s to put out. That calculation carries costs. A nuclear state fighting one neighbor, frozen out by another, and watching a third descend into war on its doorstep is exactly the kind of cascading regional breakdown that tends to pull Washington back in regardless of its intentions. The security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal under simultaneous pressure on three fronts, the risk of jihadist networks exploiting the chaos in Balochistan, and the potential for an escalation that pulls in India — all of these are American national security equities, whether Washington chooses to engage or not. The Eid pause now expiring gives diplomats the narrowest of windows. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey all called this week for a path toward a sustainable agreement. Whether the structural conditions for such an agreement exist is another matter entirely. Pakistan’s preconditions — TTP sanctuaries dismantled, militant leaders handed over — are non-starters for a Taliban government that has staked its domestic legitimacy on refusing to be seen as compliant with Islamabad’s demands. The Taliban’s own precondition, recognition of Afghan sovereignty over the Durand Line, is equally unacceptable to Pakistan’s military establishment. The underlying drivers are unchanged. As Pande frames it, the core problem is not a lack of mediation but a lack of political will on both sides. “The Afghan Taliban believes they are no longer beholden to Pakistan, they are in power, and they are reluctant to act against their ideological ally, the TTP,†she adds. “Pakistan believes that since it helped the Afghan Taliban regain power, the latter should be grateful to Pakistan, should keep Pakistan’s interests in mind and should tame the TTP. The key challenge for Pakistan is the ongoing conflict with its former proxy.†The Cipher Brief is committed to publishing a range of perspectives on national security issues submitted by deeply experienced national security professionals. Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views or opinions of The Cipher Brief. Have a perspective to share based on your experience in the national security field? Send it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration. Read more expert-driven national security insights, perspective and analysis in The Cipher Brief Keep reading...Show less
Iran Hormuz इजराइल मध्य पूर्व यूक्रेन Sign Upलॉग In खोज और अर्ध; अनुभाग नेविगेशनखोलें खोज Trending ओपन सोर्स रिपोर्ट <a class=equals; विश्लेषण अफ्रीकाएशियायूरोपलैटिन अमेरिकामध्य पूर्वउत्तरी अमेरिकाTech/Cyber राय क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>न्यूज़लेटर पॉडकास्ट state Secrets किताबें पुस्तक समीक्षाएंलेखक साक्षात्कारTheUnder/कवर बुक स्टोरसमीक्षक दिशा-निर्देश क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>घटनाएँ क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>डेड ड्रॉप Shop सब्सक्राइबर+ सब्सक्राइबर+सेवा की शर्तें और मूल्य निर्धारण में अपग्रेड करें नीति खोलें खोज बंद करें Search Search सामग्री लेखक 
 नवीनतम कहानियाँ
 Trending ओपन सोर्स रिपोर्ट <a class=equals; विश्लेषण अफ्रीकाएशियायूरोपलैटिन अमेरिकामध्य पूर्वउत्तरी अमेरिकाTech/Cyber राय क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>न्यूज़लेटर पॉडकास्ट state Secrets किताबें पुस्तक समीक्षालेखक साक्षात्कारअंडर/कवर बुक स्टोरसमीक्षक दिशानिर्देश घटनाएँ क्लास=’text-element’ id=equals;’sMenu_Items_0_0_13_0_0_0_0_0′>डेड ड्रॉप Shop सब्सक्राइबर+ सब्सक्राइबर+सेवा की शर्तें और मूल्य निर्धारण में अपग्रेड करें नीति सामान्य पूछताछ के लिए कृपया ईमेल करें
 info@thecipherbrief.period;com close mebmership form Welcome! जुड़े रहने और अपना अधिकतम लाभ उठाने के लिए लॉग इन करें अनुभव। वर्ग=’साइनइन-संदेश’>साइन इन <इनपुट आईडी='सदस्य-ईमेल-इनपुट' प्रकार='ईमेल' आकार=बराबर;'64' अधिकतम लंबाई=बराबर;'64' आवश्यक='आवश्यक' मान='' प्लेसहोल्डर="अपना ईमेल दर्ज करें" onkeyup="this.setAttribute('value', यह.मान);" पैटर्न=equals;'^( ;=equals;?^_`{|}~]| नवीनीकरण सदस्यता Home>; International>; <a href/ >; &न्यूलाइन; पाकिस्तान: युद्ध में रहते हुए भी शांति का दलाल&न्यूलाइन; अफगानिस्तान के साथ युद्ध, ईरान में अस्थिरता, और भारत के साथ तनाव एक क्षेत्रीय संकट में परिवर्तित हो रहा है जिसे रोकने के लिए इस्लामाबाद को संघर्ष करना पड़ सकता है। 2026 International 27 फरवरी 2026 को नंगरहार प्रांत में अफगानिस्तान और पाकिस्तान के बीच तोरखम सीमा के पास सुरक्षाकर्मी खड़े थे। जब पाकिस्तान ने अफगान राजधानी और तालिबान अधिकारियों के दक्षिणी पावर बेस पर हवाई हमले किए तो काबुल और कंधार में एएफपी के पत्रकारों ने धमाकों और जेट विमानों की आवाज सुनी। 
 (फोटो ऐमल ज़हीर द्वारा / गेटी इमेजेज के माध्यम से एएफपी)
 
 By
 class=”author_title-underlined”>होली मैके योगदान करने वाला सिफर ब्रीफ रिपोर्टर होली मैके एक सिफर ब्रीफ योगदानकर्ता लेखक&comma है; अन्वेषक और अल्पविराम और “ओनली क्राई फॉर द लिविंग” के लेखक; आईएसआईएस बैटलफील्ड के अंदर से मेमो”… उन्होंने पहले युद्ध और अल्पविराम, आतंकवाद, अल्पविराम और मानवता के खिलाफ अपराधों पर ध्यान देने के साथ चौदह वर्षों से अधिक समय तक फॉक्स न्यूज डिजिटल के लिए एक खोजी और अंतरराष्ट्रीय मामलों और युद्ध संवाददाता के रूप में काम किया था। id=equals;”sPost_Default_Layout_0_0_16_0_0_1_0_7_1_0_0_0_0_0_1″> अभी कुछ सप्ताह पहले, पाकिस्तान, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका और ईरान, के साथ युद्ध चल रहा था href=equals;”https://www.thecipherbrief.com/asia/afghanington”>अफगानिस्तान में को वर्षों में दोनों देशों के बीच सबसे खराब संघर्ष के रूप में वर्णित किया गया है A पाकिस्तान और अफगानिस्तान के बीच युद्धविराम जो 19 मार्च की आधी रात से 24 मार्च की आधी रात तक चलने वाला था – और सऊदी के अनुरोध पर मध्यस्थता की गई अरब, कतर, और तुर्की – ने लगभग एक महीने में पहली बार शांति की पेशकश की, जिसे व्यापक रूप से खुले युद्ध के रूप में वर्णित किया गया था। कुछ विश्लेषक इसे एक जोखिम/p> पाकिस्तान के सूचना मंत्री अताउल्लाह तरार थे स्पष्ट: छुट्टियों की अवधि के दौरान पाकिस्तान के अंदर कोई भी सीमा पार से हमला या आतंकवादी घटना होने पर ऑपरेशन ग़ज़ब लिल हक अधिक तीव्रता के साथ फिर से शुरू होगा। “पाकिस्तान आतंकवाद के खतरे को खत्म करने के लिए दृढ़ता से प्रतिबद्ध है,†he ने कहा. पिछले युद्धविराम आयोजित नहीं किए गए थे। अक्टूबर 2025 कुछ ही दिनों में विफल हो गया – इस्तांबुल शांति वार्ता 29 अक्टूबर को टूट गई और पाकिस्तान ने कुछ ही समय बाद तालिबान सरकार को धमकी दी। दिसंबर 2025 में सऊदी के नेतृत्व वाली मध्यस्थता भी विफल रही “अफगानिस्तान के खिलाफ खुला युद्ध. फरवरी के अंत में ऑपरेशन ग़ज़ब लिल हक – काबुल भर में तालिबान के ठिकानों पर हवाई और ज़मीनी हमले, कंधार&अल्पविराम; पक्तिया&अल्पविराम; नांगरहार&अल्पविराम; खोस्त&अल्पविराम; और पक्तिका&अल्पविराम; सबसे महत्वपूर्ण क्रॉस-बॉर्डर सैन्य कार्रवाई 2021 में तालिबान के दोबारा सत्ता में आने के बाद से। पाकिस्तानी अधिकारी अब दावा करते हैं कि 684 से अधिक तालिबान लड़ाके मारे गए, 912 से अधिक घायल&अल्पविराम; 252 पोस्ट नष्ट&अल्पविराम; और 229 टैंक&अल्पविराम; बख्तरबंद वाहन&अल्पविराम; और तोपखाने की बंदूकेंaction. तालिबान उन सभी आंकड़ों पर विवाद करता है। पाकिस्तानी हवाई हमलों ने काबुल पर हमला किया है बार-बार, अफगान बलों ने ड्रोन और मोर्टार सीमा पार वापस भेजे हैं, और संयुक्त राष्ट्र है लड़ाई शुरू होने के बाद से कम से कम 289 अफगान नागरिक हताहत हुए – उनमें से 104 बच्चे और अल्पविराम; 59 महिलाएं। सबसे खराब दिन 16 मार्च को आया। एक पाकिस्तानी हवाई हमले ने Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital in Kabul while patients were inside. Afghan authorities counted more than 400 dead. The UN put the confirmed figure at 143 or more. Pakistan said it had struck only military infrastructure. The following day, mass funerals moved through the capital. Aparna Pande, Senior Fellow for India and South Asia at the Hudson Institute, tells The Cipher Brief that the ceasefire pattern should surprise no one. “Historically speaking, these ceasefires have never been durable,†she says. “Each side has simply used the pause in fighting to rebuild and replenish before the next round.†With the truce now expiring and both sides’ core grievances entirely unresolved, the question pressing analysts is whether Islamabad has a realistic end-state in mind, or whether open war with a nuclear-armed state’s most volatile neighbor has become a policy that Pakistan can start but not finish. A relationship Pakistan can no longer manage The roots of this conflict run directly through Islamabad’s own strategic choices. For decades, Pakistan cultivated the Afghan Taliban as a buffer against Indian influence, the doctrine of “strategic depth,†conceived in the 1980s, envisioned a pliant Kabul as an extension of Pakistani security space. That calculation has collapsed entirely. The immediate trigger for the current war is the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, the militant group that Islamabad accuses Kabul of sheltering and enabling. TTP attacks inside Pakistan have dramatically escalated since 2021, and Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir said during a March 4 visit to troops in South Waziristan that peace can only exist if the Taliban “renounced their support for terrorism and terrorist organisations.†The Taliban, meanwhile, have never recognized the Durand Line, the colonial-era border Pakistan regards as sacrosanct, and that dispute alone makes any durable political settlement nearly impossible to achieve. Aref Dostyar, Director of the Afghanistan Program at the University of Notre Dame and former senior Afghan diplomat, tells The Cipher Brief that Pakistan’s military logic is backfiring on itself. “If the goal is to weaken the Taliban, Pakistan’s aggression is backfiring because it is triggering a ‘rally round the flag’ effect,†he says. “Even Taliban opponents are being cornered to choose between supporting the current regime’s stance against Pakistan or appearing to justify foreign aggression. Most are choosing the former.†The strategic paradox here is stark: Islamabad is now at war with an actor it once created, sustained, and expected to serve its interests indefinitely. Pande is equally direct: any durable agreement would require each side to move off entrenched positions that the other has shown no willingness to abandon. The Afghan Taliban would need to pressure their ideological ally, the TTP, to ease attacks inside Pakistan. For its part, Pakistan would need to accept that “it cannot combat an insurgent movement through conventional means and hence offer some economic and other incentives,†Pande says, underscoring that “there is a reason a compromise has not happened as both sides are sticking to their hardline positions.†Dostyar also questions Islamabad’s underlying objectives. “Pakistan cites the TTP as justification for ‘open war,’ but its true aims are unclear,†he analyzes. “Mapping the specific locations of Afghan targets may reveal an agenda that contradicts their stated counter-terrorism goals.†The Iranian dimension The war in Afghanistan, however, is not happening in isolation. On February 28, coordinated United States and Israeli strikes on Iran killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and triggered a rapidly expanding Middle East conflict. For Pakistan, already engaged in open fighting on its northwestern border, the implications of Iranian instability on its southwestern frontier are severe. Pakistan’s western frontier with Iran runs for 565 miles, cutting through territory where both sides of the border — Pakistan’s Balochistan and Iran’s Sistan-Balochistan — have long hosted ethno-separatist insurgencies. Roughly $1.4 billion in goods moved between the two countries in 2024-2025, most of it through barter deals and informal crossings rather than anything approaching a formal trade architecture. Iranian fuel and food have kept Balochistan’s markets from seizing up entirely since the Afghan border shut in October. That lifeline now runs through a war zone, and the border districts of Balochistan, among Pakistan’s poorest, would feel any disruption most acutely. Afghanistan shares its own 572-mile border with Iran, and the stakes for Kabul are equally acute. Iran hosts an estimated three to five million Afghan refugees and migrant workers. It serves as Afghanistan’s primary remaining trade route to the sea via Chabahar port, a lifeline that became critical after Pakistan closed its border in October. With that route now disrupted by the war, Afghanistan faces a dual economic squeeze that has no near-term resolution. Pande points out that the security calculus around Balochistan is shifting fast. “Groups like the BLA have used Iranian and Afghan Baluchistan to operate inside Pakistani Baluchistan,†she observes. The BLA, the Balochistan Liberation Army, is the most powerful of several insurgent groups operating in the province, a banned separatist organization designated a foreign terrorist group by the United States that seeks to carve an independent Balochistan from Pakistani territory and has escalated sharply in recent months, carrying out coordinated bombings, train hijackings, and mass casualty attacks. “Instability inside Iran can be helpful to these groups as it may make it easier for them to move across the borders and also easier to find access to military equipment,†Pande continues, stressing that the picture cuts both ways. “Instability inside Iran and the Iranian state’s focus on the western frontier means the Pakistani state may find it easier to target these Baluch groups, knowing that Iran’s attention is diverted.†Pakistan is also home to an estimated 15 to 20 percent Shia population, one of the largest outside Iran. Violence erupted in Pakistani cities following news of Khamenei’s death. Jihadist networks, including the Islamic State Khorasan Province, al-Qaeda, and the TTP, have been trying to expand their footprints in Balochistan, and instability in Iran would divert Pakistani security resources toward border management, creating an opening for those networks to grow. In Balochistan’s Makran coast region, home to the Chinese-operated deep-sea port of Gwadar, local officials have advised residents to avoid Iranian territory entirely. A nuclear state on three fronts Then there is India. Last May, the two nuclear-armed neighbors fought their most intense clash since 1971. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, striking nine sites linked to militant groups Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir — the first time India had struck inside Pakistan’s Punjab province since the 1971 war. When reports surfaced that Pakistan had summoned its Nuclear Command Authority, the body that controls decisions over its nuclear arsenal, the crisis took on a different character altogether. Analysts read it as a calculated signal. Pakistani officials later said no such meeting occurred. Fears of escalation to the nuclear threshold drove United States government involvement, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio working the phones before President Trump announced the ceasefire on social media on May 10. The intervention produced a fragile truce yet left the underlying tensions entirely intact. Delhi has held the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance since then, a move Islamabad has called an act of war. The Indus basin supplies roughly 80 percent of Pakistan’s irrigated agricultural land and underpins a sector that accounts for nearly a quarter of GDP. Dostyar does not mince words about where all this leaves Islamabad. “Pakistan is facing a failing economy, political instability, and internal separatist movements,†he asserts. “In the face of all this, it is an enormous gamble to engage in multiple external conflicts. It may be a ‘distraction’ strategy, but it poses a significant regional risk, particularly regarding the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.†Pande agrees the military believes it can manage all three frontiers for now, partly because of what she describes as confidence in Washington’s backing and a mutual defense arrangement Pakistan concluded with Saudi Arabia in September 2025, which stipulates that any aggression against either country is treated as aggression against both. Still, she flags a structural weakness in the information campaign that sustains it. “The message being sent by the top brass is that events that are happening are a conspiracy against Pakistan, in an attempt to rally the people to support the state and its actions,†she says. That Washington has left the mediation work entirely to Ankara, Doha, and Riyadh is itself telling and consequential. As Dostyar puts it, “Washington’s apparent absence from mediation is likely driven by either insufficient awareness about what is truly going on or a strategic choice due to competing priorities.†In plain terms, the United States is either not paying close enough attention or has decided this fire is someone else’s to put out. That calculation carries costs. A nuclear state fighting one neighbor, frozen out by another, and watching a third descend into war on its doorstep is exactly the kind of cascading regional breakdown that tends to pull Washington back in regardless of its intentions. The security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal under simultaneous pressure on three fronts, the risk of jihadist networks exploiting the chaos in Balochistan, and the potential for an escalation that pulls in India — all of these are American national security equities, whether Washington chooses to engage or not. The Eid pause now expiring gives diplomats the narrowest of windows. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey all called this week for a path toward a sustainable agreement. Whether the structural conditions for such an agreement exist is another matter entirely. Pakistan’s preconditions — TTP sanctuaries dismantled, militant leaders handed over — are non-starters for a Taliban government that has staked its domestic legitimacy on refusing to be seen as compliant with Islamabad’s demands. The Taliban’s own precondition, recognition of Afghan sovereignty over the Durand Line, is equally unacceptable to Pakistan’s military establishment. The underlying drivers are unchanged. As Pande frames it, the core problem is not a lack of mediation but a lack of political will on both sides. “The Afghan Taliban believes they are no longer beholden to Pakistan, they are in power, and they are reluctant to act against their ideological ally, the TTP,†she adds. “Pakistan believes that since it helped the Afghan Taliban regain power, the latter should be grateful to Pakistan, should keep Pakistan’s interests in mind and should tame the TTP. The key challenge for Pakistan is the ongoing conflict with its former proxy.†The Cipher Brief is committed to publishing a range of perspectives on national security issues submitted by deeply experienced national security professionals. Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views or opinions of The Cipher Brief. Have a perspective to share based on your experience in the national security field? Send it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration. Read more expert-driven national security insights, perspective and analysis in The Cipher Brief Keep reading...Show less
